Tuesday, February 01, 2011

The Big 4-0... and then some

It's that time again...here's my week 11 weight loss update:

At 28 years old, who'd have thought I'd be celebrating the big 4-0 mark.  I've passed the 40 pound mark in my weight loss efforts.  I'm definitely pleased with the progress over the past week, but I better not rest on my laurels, as I still have quite a way to go.  Thanks to all my friends and family who've cheered me on.

Starting weight: 400.2 pounds on 11/16/2010
Current weight: 359.0 (as of 2/1/2011, 11 weeks into the diet)
Net Change (week): 3.8 pounds lost
Total Net change: 41.2 pounds lost
Goal: Get down to 300 pounds (or less) within 1 year (by 11/16/2011)

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Paul Ryan's response to Obama's State of the Union address


REMARKS OF CONGRESSMAN PAUL RYAN (R-WI) – AS PREPARED FOR DELIVERY
House Budget Committee Hearing Room, Washington, DC 
January 25, 2011
Good evening. I’m Congressman Paul Ryan from Janesville, Wisconsin – and Chairman here at the House Budget Committee.
President Obama just addressed a Congressional chamber filled with many new faces. One face we did not see tonight was that of our friend and colleague, Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona. We all miss Gabby and her cheerful spirit; and we are praying for her return to the House Chamber.
Earlier this month, President Obama spoke movingly at a memorial event for the six people who died on that violent morning in Tucson. Still, there are no words that can lift the sorrow that now engulfs the families and friends of the fallen.
What we can do is assure them that the nation is praying for them; that, in the words of the Psalmist, the Lord heals the broken hearted and binds up their wounds; and that over time grace will replace grief.
*****
As Gabby continues to make encouraging progress, we must keep her and the others in our thoughts as we attend to the work now before us.
Tonight, the President focused a lot of attention on our economy in general – and on our deficit and debt in particular.
He was right to do so, and some of his words were reassuring. As Chairman of the House Budget Committee, I assure you that we want to work with the President to restrain federal spending.
In one of our first acts in the new majority, House Republicans voted to cut Congress’s own budget. And just today, the House voted to restore the spending discipline that Washington sorely needs.
The reason is simple.
A few years ago, reducing spending was important. Today, it’s imperative. Here’s why.
We face a crushing burden of debt. The debt will soon eclipse our entire economy, and grow to catastrophic levels in the years ahead.
On this current path, when my three children – who are now 6, 7, and 8 years old – are raising their own children, the Federal government will double in size, and so will the taxes they pay.
No economy can sustain such high levels of debt and taxation. The next generation will inherit a stagnant economy and a diminished country.
Frankly, it’s one of my greatest concerns as a parent – and I know many of you feel the same way.
*****
Our debt is the product of acts by many presidents and many Congresses over many years. No one person or party is responsible for it.
There is no doubt the President came into office facing a severe fiscal and economic situation.
Unfortunately, instead of restoring the fundamentals of economic growth, he engaged in a stimulus spending spree that not only failed to deliver on its promise to create jobs, but also plunged us even deeper into debt.
The facts are clear: Since taking office, President Obama has signed into law spending increases of nearly 25% for domestic government agencies – an 84% increase when you include the failed stimulus.
All of this new government spending was sold as “investment.” Yet after two years, the unemployment rate remains above 9% and government has added over $3 trillion to our debt.
Then the President and his party made matters even worse, by creating a new open-ended health care entitlement.
What we already know about the President’s health care law is this: Costs are going up, premiums are rising, and millions of people will lose the coverage they currently have. Job creation is being stifled by all of its taxes, penalties, mandates and fees.
Businesses and unions from around the country are asking the Obama Administration for waivers from the mandates. Washington should not be in the business of picking winners and losers. The President mentioned the need for regulatory reform to ease the burden on American businesses. We agree – and we think his health care law would be a great place to start.
Last week, House Republicans voted for a full repeal of this law, as we pledged to do, and we will work to replace it with fiscally responsible, patient-centered reforms that actually reduce costs and expand coverage.
Health care spending is driving the explosive growth of our debt. And the President’s law is accelerating our country toward bankruptcy.
Our debt is out of control. What was a fiscal challenge is now a fiscal crisis.
We cannot deny it; instead we must, as Americans, confront it responsibly.
*****
And that is exactly what Republicans pledge to do.
Americans are skeptical of both political parties, and that skepticism is justified – especially when it comes to spending. So hold all of us accountable.
In this very room, the House will produce, debate, and advance a budget. Last year – in an unprecedented failure – Congress chose not to pass, or even propose a budget. The spending spree continued unchecked.
*****
We owe you a better choice and a different vision.
Our forthcoming budget is our obligation to you – to show you how we intend to do things differently … how we will cut spending to get the debt down… help create jobs and prosperity … and reform government programs. If we act soon, and if we act responsibly, people in and near retirement will be protected.
These budget debates are not just about the programs of government; they’re also about the purpose of government.
So I’d like to share with you the principles that guide us. They are anchored in the wisdom of the founders; in the spirit of the Declaration of Independence; and in the words of the American Constitution.
They have to do with the importance of limited government; and with the blessing of self-government.
*****
We believe government’s role is both vital and limited – to defend the nation from attack and provide for the common defense … to secure our borders… to protect innocent life… to uphold our laws and Constitutional rights … to ensure domestic tranquility and equal opportunity … and to help provide a safety net for those who cannot provide for themselves.
We believe that the government has an important role to create the conditions that promote entrepreneurship, upward mobility, and individual responsibility.
We believe, as our founders did, that “the pursuit of happiness” depends upon individual liberty; and individual liberty requires limited government.
*****
Limited government also means effective government. When government takes on too many tasks, it usually doesn’t do any of them very well. It’s no coincidence that trust in government is at an all-time low now that the size of government is at an all-time high.
The President and the Democratic Leadership have shown, by their actions, that they believe government needs to increase its size and its reach, its price tag and its power.
*****
Whether sold as “stimulus” or repackaged as “investment,” their actions show they want a Federal government that controls too much; taxes too much; and spends too much in order to do too much.
And during the last two years, that is exactly what we have gotten – along with record deficits and debt – to the point where the President is now urging Congress to increase the debt limit.
We believe the days of business as usual must come to an end. We hold to a couple of simple convictions: Endless borrowing is not a strategy; spending cuts have to come first.
*****
Our nation is approaching a tipping point.
We are at a moment, where if government’s growth is left unchecked and unchallenged, America’s best century will be considered our past century. This is a future in which we will transform our social safety net into a hammock, which lulls able-bodied people into lives of complacency and dependency.
Depending on bureaucracy to foster innovation, competitiveness, and wise consumer choices has never worked – and it won’t work now.
We need to chart a new course.
*****
Speaking candidly, as one citizen to another: We still have time… but not much time. If we continue down our current path, we know what our future will be.
Just take a look at what’s happening to Greece, Ireland, the United Kingdom and other nations in Europe. They didn’t act soon enough; and now their governments have been forced to impose painful austerity measures: large benefit cuts to seniors and huge tax increases on everybody.
Their day of reckoning has arrived. Ours is around the corner. That is why we must act now.
*****
Some people will back away from this challenge. But I see this challenge as an opportunity to rebuild what Lincoln called the “central ideas” of the Republic.
We believe a renewed commitment to limited government will unshackle our economy and create millions of new jobs and opportunities for all people, of every background, to succeed and prosper. Under this approach, the spirit of initiative – not political clout – determines who succeeds.
Millions of families have fallen on hard times not because of our ideals of free enterprise – but because our leaders failed to live up to those ideals; because of poor decisions made in Washington and Wall Street that caused a financial crisis, squandered our savings, broke our trust, and crippled our economy.
Today, a similar kind of irresponsibility threatens not only our livelihoods but our way of life.
*****
We need to reclaim our American system of limited government, low taxes, reasonable regulations, and sound money, which has blessed us with unprecedented prosperity. And it has done more to help the poor than any other economic system ever designed. That’s the real secret to job creation – not borrowing and spending more money in Washington.
Limited government and free enterprise have helped make America the greatest nation on earth.
*****
These are not easy times, but America is an exceptional nation. In all the chapters of human history, there has never been anything quite like America. The American story has been cherished, advanced, and defended over the centuries.
And it now falls to this generation to pass on to our children a nation that is stronger, more vibrant, more decent, and better than the one we inherited.
Thank you and good night.

Slow and Steady Wins the Race

Week 10 Weight Loss Odyssey Update:


Not as much of a gain as last week, but considering little Chloe decided to make an early appearance this past Wednesday, 1/19/11, and thus I was stuck with hospital food and missed two days of kettlebell training--not too shabby, if I do say so myself.

Starting weight: 400.2 pounds on 11/16/2010
Current weight: 362.8 (as of 1/25/2011, 10 weeks into the diet)
Net Change (week): 2.6 pounds lost
Total Net change: 37.4 pounds lost
Goal: 300 pounds within 1 year (by 11/16/2011)

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Tocqueville on Government Rules

"It covers the surface of society with a network of small complicated rules, minute and uniform, through which the most original minds and the most energetic characters cannot penetrate, to rise above the crowd. The will of man is not shattered, but softened, bent, and guided; men are seldom forced by it to act, but they are constantly restrained from acting. Such a power does not destroy, but it prevents existence; it does not tyrannize, but it compresses, enervates, extinguishes, and stupefies a people, till each nation is reduced to nothing better than a flock of timid and industrious animals, of which the government is the shepherd." -- Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, Chapter VI

Seems a bit prophetic in hindsight, given this was published in the 1830's.

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Progress!

Week 9 Update

Starting weight: 400.2 pounds on 11/16/2010
Current weight: 365.4 (as of 1/19/2011, 9 weeks into the diet)
Net Change (week): 5.4 pounds lost
Total Net change: 34.8 pounds lost
Goal: 300 pounds within 1 year (by 11/16/2011)

Now that's what I call progress!

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Setbacks

Week 8 Update

Starting weight: 400.2 pounds on 11/16/2010
Current weight: 370.8 (as of 1/12/2011, 8 weeks into the diet)
Net Change (week): 0 pounds lost
Total Net change: 29.2 pounds lost
Goal: 300 pounds within 1 year (by 11/16/2011)

Good grief, another plateau? Maybe I need something to help suppress my appetite...

Wednesday, January 05, 2011

I've lost Molly! (not what you think)

Week 7 Weight Loss Update:

Starting weight: 400.2 pounds on 11/16/2010
Current weight: 370.8 (as of 1/5/2011, 7 weeks into the diet)
Net Change (week): 5.2 pounds lost
Total Net change: 29.2 pounds lost
Goal: 300 pounds within 1 year (by 11/16/2011)

I've lost the equivalent weight of my almost 2-year-old toddler daughter. Now THAT's what I like to see on the scale!

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Update: 6th Week Edition

Week 6 Weight Loss Update:

Starting weight: 400.2 pounds on 11/16/2010
Current weight: 376 (as of 12/29/2010, 6 weeks into the diet)
Net Change (week): 0.4 pounds gained
Total Net change: 24.2 pounds lost
Goal: 300 pounds within 1 year (by 11/16/2011)

AAARGH! I gained weight?! Given I had Christmas dinner at Maw-Maw Davis' this past week, I guess I shouldn't be too surprised. I won't let this discourage me too much. I know I"m getting smaller, as I've had to drill a second extra notch into my belt to keep my pants up, and my size 14.5 wedding ring is starting to fall off my hand more often.

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Almost 25 pounds down!

Week 5 Weight Loss Update:

Starting weight: 400.2 pounds on 11/16/2010
Current weight: 375.6 (as of 12/22/2010, 5 weeks into the diet)
Net Change (week): 3.8 pounds lost
Total Net change: 24.6 pounds lost
Goal: 300 pounds within 1 year (by 11/16/2011)

I'm almost a quarter of the way there. I've had to drill out holes on my belts so they can keep my now loose-fitting pants on me. I suppose that's a good problem to have though. Still on Pavel's Enter the Kettlebell program minimum of alternating days of kettlebell swings and turkish get-ups. Still on the 16 kg (35 lb) bell for swings, but only doing bodyweight TGUs right now, which is still a workout at 375.6 pounds. Thanks to everyone for all the encouragement.

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

I've got a fever, and the only prescription...

...is more kettlebell!

Here's where I stand as of week 4:

Starting weight: 400.2 pounds on 11/16/2010
Current weight: 379.4 (as of 12/14/2010, 4 weeks into the diet)
Net Change (week): 2.8 pounds lost
Total Net change: 20.8 pounds lost
Goal: 300 pounds within 1 year (by 11/16/2011)

This past week, I started adding real exercise, whereas up to now I was just trying to take stair at work, go for 15-25 min walks as worked allowed, etc. Because of the high intensity with minimal time investment, I've started kettlebell training. So, far, I'm going foor 10-15 min workouts with a mix of sumo deadlifts, clean & press, and two-handed swings, emphasizing the latter two.

Tuesday, December 07, 2010

Week 3 Diet Update

Here's where I stand as of week 2:

Starting weight: 400.2 pounds on 11/16/2010
Current weight: 382.0 (as of 12/07/2010, 3 weeks into the diet)
Net Change (week): 3 pounds lost
Total Net change: 18.2 pounds lost
Goal: 300 pounds within 1 year (by 11/16/2011)

I'm scared I'm hitting a plateau here, as my rate of weight loss is decreasing. Still, I'm still losing, and that's good.

Monday, December 06, 2010

Perspective

I love Ecclesiastes. Lately, I've been going back to the words of the Preacher therein to put things into perspective. Especially Ecclesiastes 2:18-25 (English Standard Version, or ESV):

"[18] I hated all my toil in which I toil under the sun, seeing that I must leave it to the man who will come after me, [19] and who knows whether he will be wise or a fool? Yet he will be master of all for which I toiled and used my wisdom under the sun. This also is vanity. [20] So I turned about and gave my heart up to despair over all the toil of my labors under the sun, [21] because sometimes a person who has toiled with wisdom and knowledge and skill must leave everything to be enjoyed by someone who did not toil for it. This also is vanity and a great evil. [22] What has a man from all the toil and striving of heart with which he toils beneath the sun? [23] For all his days are full of sorrow, and his work is a vexation. Even in the night his heart does not rest. This also is vanity.

[24] There is nothing better for a person than that he should eat and drink and find enjoyment in his toil. This also, I saw, is from the hand of God, [25] for apart from him who can eat or who can have enjoyment?"

Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Week 2 Update

Here's where I stand as of week 2:

Starting weight: 400.2 pounds on 11/16/2010
Current weight: 385.0 (as of 11/30/2010, 2 weeks into the diet)
Net Change (week): 4.2 pounds lost
Total Net change: 15.2 pounds lost
Goal: 300 pounds within 1 year (by 11/16/2011)

Initially, I was discouraged, as my weight loss this week was less than half that of last week's. Then again, considering I had three Thanksgiving meals to eat last week, I guess I should be happy I'm still trending downward. Thanks again to everyone cheering me on.

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

11 down, 89 to go!

I'm making good progress thus far with my diet on loseit.com. Since starting last Tuesday, 1 week ago, I've lost 11 pounds! That's just over 10% progress toward my goal in just one week!

Starting weight: 400.2 pounds on 11/16/2010
Current weight: 389.2 (as of 11/23/2010, 1 week into the diet)
Net change: 11 pounds lost
Goal: 300 pounds within 1 year (by 11/16/2011)

I'm very encouraged by these results and can feel a difference already with the way some clothes fit and my energy level. Thanks to all my family and friends who've encouraged me to stick with it. And thanks to God, for sustaining me and giving me strength to do it.

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Weight-ing for a Wake-up Call

After my follow-up with the sleep doctor, I realized I have to get serious about losing some weight. I was 400 pounds. I was so embarassed because that's just below the maximum their scale would read. So, I started yesterday, but posting here. I'm not fishing for compliments or anything, just wanted to share.

Ideally, I'd like to get to my football playing weight of around 300 pounds. So here's my plan of attack (yesterday was my first day):


1) Portion control -- this is a huge one for me. Since yesterday, I haven't had seconds at ANY meal. If anyone knows me, they'll know that's incredibly difficult.


2) No sodas.


3) 1 or 2 [MAX] glasses of sweet tea -- can't give it up cold turkey, I am a born and raised southerner after all.


4) No late night eating -- this will be difficult. Not so much on my days off, but on my workdays. My normal workday schedule is getting up around 5:45 am, arriving at work at 7 am, leaving work at 7 pm. With a 40-45 minute commute each way, by the time I get home, I have to cram food in and go to bed, especially if it's one of those days I get stuck late and/or don't get to leave my desk to get a bite.


So there it is. I hope and pray I stick to it. I hope I'm not being too ambitious. But if David Smith (aka the 600 lb Virgin on a TLC special) can lose 401 pounds in 26 months, 100 in 12 months should be in the realm of possibility. You can read his story here: http://www.staxsystem.com/davids_story.html


Starting weight: 400.2 pounds (as of 8 am this morning)
Target weight: 300 pounds
Goal date: November 16th, 2011

Thursday, January 17, 2008

The Truth about Mike Huckabee

I have had it with fellow Christians jumping on the Mike Huckabee bandwagon solely because he was a Baptist minister. Below are some YouTube clips which show the side of Mike Huckabee that the James Dobson sheep don't want you to see:

On ID cards for Illegals:


And on raising taxes as governor of Arkansas:


And here he is caught lying about the tax hikes:


CNN exposing his record on taxes, immigration, and releasing a muderer/rapist:


I don't know how much more my parents and other Huck-a-bucks need to see this guy is another slick willy like the last governor from Hope, AR, to become President of the US, Bill Clinton.

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

It's not yours to give

In light of the "housing crisis" and everyone's desire for a government bailout of irresponsible borrowers and lenders, I remembered a speech by Col. David Crockett during his time as a US Congressmen from Tennessee. To give historical context to this, the Speaker of the House was about to put a bill to vote for appropriating money for the benefit of a widow of a distinguished naval officer. Several moving speeches had been made in the bill's favor when Crockett stood up and spoke:
“Mr. Speaker–I have as much respect for the memory of the deceased, and as much sympathy for the sufferings of the living, if suffering there be, as any man in this House, but we must not permit our respect for the dead or our sympathy for a part of the living to lead us into an act of injustice to the balance of the living. I will not go into an argument to prove that Congress has no power to appropriate this money as an act of charity. Every member upon this floor knows it. We have the right, as individuals, to give away as much of our own money as we please in charity; but as members of Congress we have no right so to appropriate a dollar of the public money. Some eloquent appeals have been made to us upon the ground that it is a debt due the deceased. Mr. Speaker, the deceased lived long after the close of the war; he was in office to the day of his death, and I have never heard that the government was in arrears to him.

Every man in this House knows it is not a debt. We cannot, without the grossest corruption, appropriate this money as the payment of a debt. We have not the semblance of authority to appropriate it as a charity. Mr. Speaker, I have said we have the right to give as much money of our own as we please. I am the poorest man on this floor. I cannot vote for this bill, but I will give one week’s pay to the object, and if every member of Congress will do the same, it will amount to more than the bill asks.”

He took his seat. Nobody replied. The bill was put upon its passage, and, instead of passing unanimously, as was generally supposed, and as, no doubt, it would, but for that speech, it received but few votes, and, of course, was lost.


Something to consider every time someone calls for a government bailout.

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Never forget.

EDIT: Apparently, YouTube took down the original video I had posted. Here's another one of the 9/11 attack footage.






Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Intellectual and physical disarmament must stop here!

Check out another great write-up regarding the Virginia Tech massacre from Michelle Malkin here. Thw quotes from the VT administration are especially interesting, as shown in the excerpt below:
As news was breaking about the carnage at Virginia Tech, a reader e-mailed me a news story from last January. State legislators in Virginia had attempted to pass a bill that would have eased handgun restrictions on college campuses. Opposed by outspoken, anti-gun activists and Virginia Tech administrators, that bill failed.

Is it too early to ask: "What if?" What if that bill had passed? What if just one student in one of those classrooms had been in lawful possession of a concealed weapon for the purpose of self-defense?

If it wasn't too early for Keystone Katie Couric to be jumping all over campus security yesterday for what they woulda/coulda/shoulda done in the immediate aftermath of the shooting, and if it isn't too early for the New York Times editorial board to be publishing its knee-jerk call for more gun control, it darned well isn't too early for me to raise questions about how the unrepentant anti-gun lobbying of college officials may have put students at risk.

The back story: Virginia Tech had punished a student for bringing a handgun to class last spring—despite the fact that the student had a valid concealed handgun permit. The bill would have barred public universities from making "rules or regulations limiting or abridging the ability of a student who possesses a valid concealed handgun permit ... from lawfully carrying a concealed handgun." After the proposal died in subcommittee, the school's governing board reiterated its ban on students or employees carrying guns and prohibiting visitors from bringing them into campus buildings.

Late last summer, a shooting near campus prompted students to clamor again for loosening campus rules against armed self-defense. Virginia Tech officials turned up their noses. In response to student Bradford Wiles's campus newspaper op-ed piece in support of concealed carry on campus, Virginia Tech associate vice president Larry Hincker scoffed:

"[I]t is absolutely mind-boggling to see the opinions of Bradford Wiles…The editors of this page must have printed this commentary if for no other reason than malicious compliance. Surely, they scratched their heads saying, 'I can't believe he really wants to say that.' Wiles tells us that he didn't feel safe with the hundreds of highly trained officers armed with high powered rifles encircling the building and protecting him. He even implies that he needed his sidearm to protect himself."

The nerve!

Hincker continued: "The writer would have us believe that a university campus, with tens of thousands of young people, is safer with everyone packing heat. Imagine the continual fear of students in that scenario. We've seen that fear here, and we don't want to see it again…Guns don't belong in classrooms. They never will. Virginia Tech has a very sound policy preventing same."

Who's scratching his head now, Mr. Hincker?

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

"Gun-Free Zones"? Not so much...

In light of the recent massacre at Virginia Tech, I felt I needed to bring some information to light that you most likely won't hear amidst the baying of the gun controlling (a.k.a, "Just be a Victim") crowd.

Check out these articles I found referenced on Michelle Malkin's blog. This first article was published on January 31st, 2006, just over a year ago. From Roanoke.com:

Gun bill gets shot down by panel

HB 1572, which would have allowed handguns on college campuses, died in subcommittee.

A bill that would have given college students and employees the right to carry handguns on campus died with nary a shot being fired in the General Assembly.

House Bill 1572 didn't get through the House Committee on Militia, Police and Public Safety. It died Monday in the subcommittee stage, the first of several hurdles bills must overcome before becoming laws.

The bill was proposed by Del. Todd Gilbert, R-Shenandoah County, on behalf of the Virginia Citizens Defense League. Gilbert was unavailable Monday and spokesman Gary Frink would not comment on the bill's defeat other than to say the issue was dead for this General Assembly session.

Virginia Tech spokesman Larry Hincker was happy to hear the bill was defeated. "I'm sure the university community is appreciative of the General Assembly's actions because this will help parents, students, faculty and visitors feel safe on our campus."[emphasis added - Tim]

Del. Dave Nutter, R-Christiansburg, would not comment Monday because he was not part of the subcommittee that discussed the bill.

Most universities in Virginia require students and employees, other than police, to check their guns with police or campus security upon entering campus. The legislation was designed to prohibit public universities from making "rules or regulations limiting or abridging the ability of a student who possesses a valid concealed handgun permit ... from lawfully carrying a concealed handgun."

The legislation allowed for exceptions for participants in athletic events, storage of guns in residence halls and military training programs.

Last spring a Virginia Tech student was disciplined for bringing a handgun to class, despite having a concealed handgun permit. Some gun owners questioned the university's authority, while the Virginia Association of Chiefs of Police came out against the presence of guns on campus.

In June, Tech's governing board approved a violence prevention policy reiterating its ban on students or employees carrying guns and prohibiting visitors from bringing them into campus facilities.

Clearly, yesterday's events show that "feeling" safer and actually "being" safer are not one and the same. And for anyone who thinks that passage of that law wouldn't have made a difference here, check out this excerpt from an article at CNSNews.com:

Student Group Wants Campus Gun Ban Lifted
By Christine Hall
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
September 17, 2002

(CNSNews.com) - After two armed southwest Virginia law students stopped a campus shooting rampage in January, a Second Amendment group at a northern Virginia law school decided it was time to change their own school's ban on guns.

"We are trying to build a detailed and persuasive brief that would include statistics on increases in safety, decreases in violent crime when you do have concealed carry permit holders in a jurisdiction," said Orest J. Jowyk, president of the Second Amendment group at George Mason University School of Law.

"I think the middle ground is to allow concealed handgun permit holders to carry just like they can anywhere else in Virginia," he said. "You provide extra safety to the student body that way."

Jowyk began researching his law school's gun policy following the January incident in which a disgruntled student at Appalachian Law School, Peter Odighizuwa, allegedly shot and killed the school's dean, a professor and a student on campus before being subdued by two armed students, Mikael Gross and Tracy Bridges.